Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:01:12
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch by "Petteri Räty"
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:18:03 +0200
Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote:

> There seems to be two different schools on who to assign a keywording > bug with only a single arch. I have myself assigned it to the arch in > question but there's a difference of opinion here: > > Let's get agreed on a single approach and I will add a note here: > > I naturally support the approach I have been doing as I think the arch > team is the one in charge.
I swear there used to be a piece of documentation that said that the final arch on a stabilization bug should be assigned and the maintainer moved to CC. I can't find it any more, but that's probably where this idea came from. It never really made sense to me but I've done it on several occasions. -- fonts, by design, by neglect gcc-porting, for a fact or just for effect wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662


File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature