Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Renat Lumpau <rl03@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:19:04
Message-Id: 20060228221212.GN11818@toucan.gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 09:57:05PM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:50:40 +0000 Renat Lumpau <rl03@g.o> wrote:
3 > | On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 04:31:37PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
4 > | > today's lesson: proactive QA is frowned upon, it's only a bug when
5 > | > a user files a report at bugs.gentoo.org
6 > |
7 > | I don't think that's the lesson. It oughtta be: we need a way to
8 > | figure out which QA issues are important and which are less so. A QA
9 > | team member's opinion (personal attacks, whatever) should be an
10 > | important input but not the final say.
11 >
12 > Important QA issues are, first and foremost, the ones that can be
13 > detected and fixed quickly.
14
15 You mean like whitespace and syntax that affects noone?
16
17 --
18 Renat Lumpau all things web-apps
19 C6A838DA 04AF B5EE 17CB 1000 DDA5 D3FC 1338 ADC2 C6A8 38DA
20 America - land of the free*
21 *Void where prohibited, restrictions apply. Cash value 1/100c.