| 1 |
unfortunately the only solution for this is to install 2.95, i could |
| 2 |
explain why it's not possible, but since you are asking this question, i |
| 3 |
doubt it would do any good (no offence) the only solution is to install |
| 4 |
gcc2.95 and use the gcc switching utility that comes with the package (i |
| 5 |
think it's called gcc-select or something) sorry i couldn't give you |
| 6 |
better news |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 20:06, Henti Smith wrote: |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> howdy :) |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> As part of the openexr stuff I'm doing, we are working on a openexr Shake plugin (http://www.apple.com/shake/) |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> the problem is the plugin has to be compiled using the same gcc that shake was compiled with, in this instance gcc 2.9.5 (higher then |
| 15 |
> 2.95.3) |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> What would be the easest way to be able to compile 2.9.5 supported binaries with 3.x.x gcc ? |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Would it just be easer to build a custom box with gcc 2.9.5 and do a binary gentoo release for this ? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-------------- |
| 22 |
A man without a God is like a fish without a bicycle. |
| 23 |
-------------- |
| 24 |
Nicholas Hockey (tilt@××××××××××.net) |
| 25 |
Encrypted E-Mail preferred |
Archives