| 1 |
On 6/21/06, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
| 2 |
> "Caleb Tennis" <caleb@g.o> posted |
| 3 |
> 34384.192.168.2.159.1150898601.squirrel@××××××××××××.com, excerpted below, |
| 4 |
> on Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:03:21 -0400: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > [Stefan Schweizer wrote...] |
| 7 |
> >> qt3 - enable optional qt3 support |
| 8 |
> >> qt4 - enable optional qt4 support |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > Maybe I just need a little time to warm up to this. :) |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
[snip] |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> This should be the clearest from a user perspective, and should require |
| 15 |
> the minimal amount of package.use magic, yet it remains an option where a |
| 16 |
> user finds it necessary. There will be a bit of disruption when KDE4 |
| 17 |
> ultimately stabilizes, but handled correctly, it shouldn't be any more of |
| 18 |
> a problem than any major version upgrade on a major desktop environment |
| 19 |
> would be -- that is, while some problems should be expected (and well |
| 20 |
> published in GWN and the like before stabilization), they should be |
| 21 |
> resolvable, and temporary. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
When do you propose qt4 hits make.defaults? When kde4 hits p.mask, |
| 26 |
when it hits ~arch, or when it hits arch? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
I think mr_bones__ idea was the most appropriate thus far. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> -- |
| 31 |
> Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 32 |
> "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 33 |
> and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> -- |
| 36 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives