Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Josh Saddler <nightmorph@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] July Council Meeting: Requested Agenda Item
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 10:59:11
Message-Id: 448BF691.8010005@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] July Council Meeting: Requested Agenda Item by Marius Mauch
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Marius Mauch wrote:
5 > On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 01:00:43 +0200
6 > Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> wrote:
7 >
8 >> On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 11:37 -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
9 >>> Have the GWN posted to -core in a sane time period prior to it's
10 >>> release. I seriously doubt anyone cares about whether the
11 >>> publication is always "on time" (whatever that may be).
12 >> So what would a sane time period be? 12h? 24h?
13 >> The problem with that is that you need an editor who is available
14 >> during this period to add corrections, but with the new influx of
15 >> helpers I think we can manage.
16 >
17 > It should be sent *at least* 24 hours in advance IMO so everyone gets
18 > a chance to check it. Better to send news that's a few days old than to
19 > send incorrect news.
20
21 Agreed. A full day in advance helps ensure that any needed corrections or
22 additions can make it in.
23
24 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
25 Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
26
27 iD8DBQFEi/aQrsJQqN81j74RAu9PAKCFkXjY1/u1s4Xk2y2z8m0RdTwHwACcCm4W
28 RRtsFocJpavIee8jaZpnnWM=
29 =vBld
30 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
31 --
32 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list