| 1 |
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 20:44:42 +0000 Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
| On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 03:36:33PM -0500, Dan Meltzer wrote: |
| 4 |
| > Well, it would be changing Glep 1... which probably needs an |
| 5 |
| > ammendatory GLEP |
| 6 |
| |
| 7 |
| or we avoid all the redtape bs and just do it, let anarchy rule |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
It's not a question of red tape. Red tape would be requiring that the |
| 10 |
GLEP be approved by twenty six different managers and team leads. It's |
| 11 |
a question of having the change documented properly so that future GLEP |
| 12 |
authors don't get bitten, and so that future GLEP authors understand |
| 13 |
the rationale so that they don't go and introduce something that has |
| 14 |
the same problems as the GLEP 1 date format. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) |
| 18 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
| 19 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
Archives