1 |
Petteri Räty kirjoitti: |
2 |
> Alexander Færøy kirjoitti: |
3 |
>> On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 12:13:12AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: |
4 |
>>> Isn't such use case just a replacement for elog? I thought news were |
5 |
>>> supposed to be delivered before upgrading. Also "You should update your |
6 |
>>> configuration files after upgrading." sounds like something one would |
7 |
>>> read before upgrade... |
8 |
>> It'll only affect users after they upgrade. |
9 |
>> |
10 |
> |
11 |
> So let's say this was a message about package foobar. If it only affects |
12 |
> users after they upgrade it would mean that new installs would get the |
13 |
> news item too, wouldn't it?. Wouldn't the proper behavior be to mark the |
14 |
> item as not applicable when it is first encountered? |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Regards, |
17 |
> Petteri |
18 |
> |
19 |
|
20 |
Ah found it in the GLEP: |
21 |
"The package manager filters the news item and, if it is relevant, marks |
22 |
the news item for reading. The package manager should also display a |
23 |
notice informing the user that there are unread news items." |
24 |
|
25 |
This means that adding a >=message is useless as it gets filtered away |
26 |
at the first sync. Use elog instead. |
27 |
|
28 |
Regards, |
29 |
Petteri |