| 1 |
Diego, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
hasufell wrote: |
| 4 |
> > I would object... 10 games are wayyyy too few for a new category and |
| 5 |
> > especially pkg moves.. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> 1 app-antivirus/ |
| 8 |
> 3 net-zope/ |
| 9 |
> 5 x11-base/ |
| 10 |
> 7 gpe-utils/ |
| 11 |
> 8 app-officeext/ |
| 12 |
> 11 net-voip/ |
| 13 |
> 12 games-kids/ |
| 14 |
> 12 gnustep-libs/ |
| 15 |
> 13 mail-mta/ |
| 16 |
> 13 dev-ada/ |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: |
| 19 |
> And? Two wrongs don't make a right. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
What do you mean by "And?" - it doesn't make much sense as a reply. :\ |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I think you need to become much more specific in order to participate |
| 24 |
in the discussion. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
"Two wrongs don't make a right." implies that you can not imagine any |
| 27 |
exception to the (whose?) rule for how many packages are the minimum |
| 28 |
allowed in a category. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
It suggests a lack of fingerspitzgefühl needed to detect when a |
| 31 |
particular rule is actually wrong, which I think is the case here, |
| 32 |
if x11-base and the other above categories are all wrong. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Sometimes it is the rule that needs to change, you know? |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
//Peter |
Archives