| 1 |
On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 16:57:30 -0500 |
| 2 |
Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 01/14/2014 04:37 PM, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > 2. I would like to see the policy below applied to all arch's [2]. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> [ ] Yup |
| 9 |
> [X] Nope |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
For which reason? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I could do |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
[✓] Yup |
| 16 |
[X] Nope |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
'cause a stable version that's no longer stable (due to found bugs) |
| 19 |
shouldn't remain, otherwise it is falsely shown to the users as being |
| 20 |
stable; whereas it could very well be old, insecure and buggy instead. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Together with a news message, users could appreciate this. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
With kind regards, |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
| 28 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
| 31 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
| 32 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |
Archives