1 |
Am Mittwoch, 2. Januar 2008 schrieb Robin H. Johnson: |
2 |
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 10:21:35PM +0100, Wolfgang Illmeyer wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> To restate it more clearly from your paragraph above: |
5 |
> kmail DEPENDS on gpgme built-with gnupg-2 |
6 |
> psi DEPENDS on gpgme built-with gnupg-1 |
7 |
> basket DEPENDS on gpgme built-with gnupg-1 |
8 |
|
9 |
Nope, psi does not depend on gpgme, it uses gpg directly - so it can use gpg1 |
10 |
while the gpgme stuff can use v2 at the same time. |
11 |
|
12 |
> The best course of action here is fixing PSI and Basket to work properly |
13 |
> with GnuPG2. |
14 |
|
15 |
AFAIK they can't be, because they need to cache the passphrase, which is not |
16 |
supported by gpg2. Does anybody know how passphrase caching works with gpg1? |
17 |
Maybe it is possible to write some plugin/extension/patch to allow gpg2 to do |
18 |
the same? |
19 |
|
20 |
> The PSI issue was being tracked in bug 183075, but the users stopped |
21 |
> providing information, and it worked from what alonbl could determine. |
22 |
> I see it's open as bug 197588 again, hopefully we get enough user |
23 |
> interaction to actually solve it now. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> I don't find any bug for Basket, could you please open one with your |
26 |
> information about the problems you are having? |
27 |
|
28 |
I'll have a look at the bugs today after work |
29 |
|
30 |
> Also, could you confirm that you are indeed running the agent before any |
31 |
> of the above stuff is started? |
32 |
|
33 |
I'm confused - do you mean the password agent? Hasn't the password agent been |
34 |
deprecated for a long time? I use pinentry for gpg2 ;) What is the advantage |
35 |
of running "the agent"? |
36 |
|
37 |
/Wolfgang |
38 |
-- |
39 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |