| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Danny van Dyk wrote: |
| 5 |
| Hi Brian, |
| 6 |
| Brian Harring schrieb: |
| 7 |
| |
| 8 |
|>>Unless someone steps up, the intel compiler toolchain |
| 9 |
|>>packages dev-lang/icc (intel cc) and dev-lang/ifc (intel fortran |
| 10 |
|>>compiler) are prime candidates for removal from the tree; open bugs, |
| 11 |
|>>primary maintainer is retired, and no devs have moved in to pick up the |
| 12 |
|>>packages, let along touched the changeslogs in around a year. |
| 13 |
|>> |
| 14 |
|>>So, any takers? |
| 15 |
|>>~brian |
| 16 |
| |
| 17 |
| |
| 18 |
| In case there are no security Bugs, i'd like to ask you to leave them in |
| 19 |
| for the time being, I'm working on getting the latest versions (8.0/8.1) |
| 20 |
| of ifort (how it is now known) and icc into the tree. The only problem |
| 21 |
| are my time constraints atm :-/. Though I have ebuilds ready, it will |
| 22 |
| still take some time to remove some minor itches before I'd commit them. |
| 23 |
| |
| 24 |
| Danny |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Please contact me in case you need any help to test the ebuilds. I think |
| 27 |
these ebuilds are far too important to be deleted from the portage tree. |
| 28 |
These tools are crucial for my (and other people's) job. |
| 29 |
Also add sci-libs/mkl to this list. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Tom |
| 32 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 33 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
iD8DBQFCgO9YQTaBhxBS2xERAupzAJ9czZC93O+inKTiNBdk2xVnhC3yIACfUeYO |
| 36 |
Mg6HX5rhO+AWdjXTAsk1FeQ= |
| 37 |
=t9MT |
| 38 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives