| 1 |
Kumba wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Here's where we want the non-devs to get access. After all, not all |
| 5 |
>> development and debugging is done by devs. All the current devs were, |
| 6 |
>> at one point, users. Where did they get their start? My bet is they |
| 7 |
>> entered via the -dev mailing list, learned the ropes here, and |
| 8 |
>> eventually earned their dev status. If the -dev list is closed, where |
| 9 |
>> do the new dev-wannabes learn the ropes and get their voices heard? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> You missed the small mention of "open" in my first sentence. I probably |
| 12 |
> should have clarified what my definition of what "open" is, but it |
| 13 |
> pretty much means no moderation on the -dev list so that users and |
| 14 |
> developers could post. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Sorry, I should have made it clear - I was agreeing with you there. I'm |
| 18 |
not a -dev yet, but if I continue to have the time to work towards it, I |
| 19 |
don't want to be blocked because someone decided that users couldn't |
| 20 |
give insights to the developers list. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Kevin |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives