1 |
Hi! dev-lang/smarteiffel doesn't exist in portage, but indeed it was there on |
2 |
bugs.gentoo.org! ;) |
3 |
|
4 |
I looked at the ebuild and saw that you didn't use $CFLAGS.. Please use this |
5 |
instead of "make automatic"! This is from my local SmallEiffel-0.74.ebuild, |
6 |
but your ebuild is better overall... ;) |
7 |
---------------------------------- |
8 |
ebegin "Compiling install-program" |
9 |
gcc ${CFLAGS} -o install install.c |
10 |
eend $? |
11 |
|
12 |
einfo "Now running the install-program..." |
13 |
( echo yes |
14 |
echo no |
15 |
echo UNIX |
16 |
echo gcc |
17 |
echo ${CFLAGS} |
18 |
echo yes |
19 |
) | ./install -interactive |
20 |
----------------------------------- |
21 |
|
22 |
Regards, |
23 |
Per Wigren |
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
Friday 22 November 2002 11:45 skrev George Shapovalov: |
28 |
> Hi Per. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> Please take a look at dev-lang/smarteiffel ;) and #8897. |
31 |
> The first issue is taken care of by using already renamed source. Please |
32 |
> take a look at the ebuild to see how was second one resolved as well as |
33 |
> some more stuff... |
34 |
> Test reports are appreciated ;) (please report either success or failure to |
35 |
> that bug). |
36 |
> |
37 |
> As for the negative version count, well it is now at 1.0 after being |
38 |
> renamed and we can only hope that package developers will follow sane |
39 |
> versioning. If not, we'll have to contact them and try to persuade to come |
40 |
> to their senses |
41 |
> |
42 |
> :), or invent more elaborative name mangling scheme.. |
43 |
> |
44 |
> George |
45 |
> |
46 |
> On Friday 22 November 2002 01:37, Per Wigren wrote: |
47 |
> > Hi! |
48 |
> > |
49 |
> > I'm about to make an ebuild of Sma{ll,rt}Eiffel and a new category |
50 |
> > dev-eiffel with a lot of extra libs, modules, bindings etc.. |
51 |
> > |
52 |
> > The problem is that SmallEiffel is about to be renamed to SmartEiffel.. |
53 |
> > The current stable release is SmallEiffel v0.74, but it will be soon be |
54 |
> > renamed to SmartEiffel when it becomes v1.0 (it's currently 1.0beta5).. |
55 |
> > |
56 |
> > How to resolve this? If I make an ebuild for SmallEiffel v0.74 now, I |
57 |
> > want it to be upgraded to SmartEiffel v1.0 when it is released.. It's the |
58 |
> > very same compiler, just renamed.. |
59 |
> > |
60 |
> > Another problem is that the filenames doesn't contain the |
61 |
> > version-number... All versions are named se.tgz so this will cause a |
62 |
> > problem when upgrading if the old one is still in distfiles... |
63 |
> > |
64 |
> > Regards, |
65 |
> > Per Wigren |
66 |
> |
67 |
> -- |
68 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
69 |
|
70 |
|
71 |
-- |
72 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |