1 |
On 04/26/15 23:21, Duncan wrote: |
2 |
> Diego Elio Pettenò posted on Sun, 26 Apr 2015 17:41:04 +0100 as excerpted: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> On 25 April 2015 at 16:57, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>>> Of course, one thing that could make the process faster would be if C++ |
7 |
>>> based packages were marked some way. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> revdep-rebuild --soname 'libstdc\+\+.so.*' |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> should do the trick. Stuff that does not link the library (statically |
12 |
>> linked or using libsupc++) should not really matter. |
13 |
> Thanks. Obvious in hindsight. =:^) |
14 |
> |
15 |
|
16 |
just saw this. This works unless you have two versions of gcc |
17 |
installed. The c++11 abi emitted by gcc-4.7 and 4.8 are different and |
18 |
since you link against the latest version (see the ordering of |
19 |
directories in /etc/ld.so.conf.d/05gcc-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.conf), |
20 |
building with the earlier gcc can cause breakage. We may not want to |
21 |
support such a situation but I'd like to. |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. |
25 |
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] |
26 |
E-Mail : blueness@g.o |
27 |
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA |
28 |
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA |