1 |
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 3:43 PM, William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> I am sending this out for review so we can commit it to the tree |
3 |
> when we commit our alternate systemd ebuild in a few days. This will be |
4 |
> set up so that users can choose which systemd package they want to |
5 |
> install, and it will default to the current systemd package. |
6 |
|
7 |
Did I miss some kind of announcement for what is going on here? An |
8 |
additional implementation in portage along with an eclass probably is |
9 |
worth some kind of intro on-list. I don't think you need to seek |
10 |
approval/etc, but it would be nice to know what your goals/etc are. |
11 |
Is this just a different installation/configuration approach, or is |
12 |
this some kind of upstream fork? |
13 |
|
14 |
Rich |