Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-" <msterret@××××.com>
To: Fred Van Andel <fava@g.o>
Cc: vapier@g.o, gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Local/per-package use flags absent from UFED
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 21:22:43
Message-Id: Pine.LNX.4.10.10307221720180.649-100000@blackhole.coat.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Local/per-package use flags absent from UFED by Fred Van Andel
1 Well, repoman complains about it so let's take a look at cvs log and see
2 who to complain to:
3
4 revision 1.2
5 date: 2003/06/26 14:45:57; author: vapier; state: Exp; lines: +6 -2
6 add parse clock support
7
8 Looks like vapier to me.
9
10 /me spanks Spanky. ;-)
11
12 Michael Sterrett
13 -Mr. Bones.-
14 msterret@g.o
15
16 On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Fred Van Andel wrote:
17
18 >
19 > "gentoo@××××××××××××.uk" <gentoo@××××××××××××.uk> wrote:
20 > (07/22/2003 13:43)
21 > >Recently, I've found that certain packages are using use flags specific to that package only but absent from ufed. Take ntp for example:
22 > >
23 > >$ emerge ntp -vp
24 > >Calculating dependencies ...done!
25 > >[ebuild N ] net-misc/ntp-4.1.1b-r6 -parse-clocks
26 > >
27 > >The '-parse-clocks' use flag was not present in ufed. I have several more examples that I cannot remember at this time.
28 >
29 > The parse-clocks flag is not defined in either /usr/portage/profile/use.desc or the /usr/portage/profiles/local.use.desc files where it is supposed to be. The only mention of the flag seems to be in the ebuild. So therefore as far as ufed is concerned that flag doesnt exist.
30 >
31 > The creater of the ebuild needs to modify one of the above mentioned files to include the flag, ufed will then automatically show it.
32 >
33 > Fred Van Andel
34 > fava@g.o
35 > GPG KeyID: 76526AD599455482
36 > GPG fingerprint: 64E4 4BAB 9C99 D565 3E3C F5D0 7652 6AD5 9945 5482
37 >
38 >
39 > --
40 > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
41 >
42 >
43
44
45 --
46 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list