1 |
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 11:00 AM Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 8:32 AM Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > On 8/14/19 5:41 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
6 |
> > > |
7 |
> > > (If the "man" user really reads things from e.g. $HOME/man5/ebuild.5, |
8 |
> > > I'll eat my foot.) |
9 |
> > > |
10 |
> > > |
11 |
> > > Agreed. Please file a bug about this. |
12 |
> > > |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > We already have bug 691478 for this issue? Only it should have been |
15 |
> > assigned to the failing package's project instead of the eclass |
16 |
> > maintainer: it's a build failure in a package that's doing something it |
17 |
> > shouldn't be doing. |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > Revbump acct-user/man and it's fixed. |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Bug 691478 is about the interaction of INSTALL_MASK with an eclass |
23 |
> pkg_preinst function. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Whether acct-user/man should set a HOME directory is related, but |
26 |
> separate issue. |
27 |
|
28 |
Bug filed. |
29 |
|
30 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/692222 |