Archives
Archives
| From: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |
|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o |
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] arch-cruft in use.mask makes me angry |
| Date: | Wed, 05 Jul 2006 01:58:18 |
| Message-Id: | 200607042154.22942.vapier@gentoo.org |
| 1 | can someone remind me why our arch USE flags are in an "opt-out" system rather |
| 2 | than "opt-in" ? instead of adding things like: |
| 3 | dmi |
| 4 | icc |
| 5 | mmx |
| 6 | svga |
| 7 | ... |
| 8 | |
| 9 | to every non-x86 profile, why dont we mask these things in base/use.mask and |
| 10 | then un-mask them in default-linux/x86 ? doesnt that make more sense ? |
| 11 | -mike |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] arch-cruft in use.mask makes me angry | Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] arch-cruft in use.mask makes me angry | Simon Stelling <blubb@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] arch-cruft in use.mask makes me angry | Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] arch-cruft in use.mask makes me angry | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |