Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Martin Vaeth <martin@×××××.de>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 11:21:04
Message-Id: slrnlt73ns.9i1.martin@epidot.math.uni-rostock.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps by Ian Stakenvicius
1 Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> wrote:
2 >
3 > The only need for EAPI change that I can see is to allow non-integer
4 > revision values
5
6 A change of the version/-revision format certainly requires
7 an EAPI change; one must also define rules how to compare
8 these versions, etc. (despite it is obvious, here).
9
10 Please be aware that on the corresponding bug there is
11 already the request to keep minor revisions for sub-distributions
12 of gentoo; so maybe instead of minor revisions one should
13 think about anpther suffix (besides -r...) or another format:
14 This would simulateneously avoid the problem of $PF
15 discussed earlier - by definition, this additional suffix
16 would not appear in $PF.