| 1 |
Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 23:11 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote: |
| 3 |
>> I'd have to agree with you on that. I understand the appeal of |
| 4 |
exciting press releases but there were over 75 GCC 4.1 bugs still open |
| 5 |
for problems in *~arch* when the decision was made to go stable. Even |
| 6 |
now there's more than 50 left, with an equal and growing number of |
| 7 |
stable bugs. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> It had nothing to do with press releases and more to do with the fact |
| 10 |
> that 50 or even 75 out of > 10,000 is beans. Also, most of that stuff |
| 11 |
> is in packages that are either unmaintained, or the maintainers are |
| 12 |
> focusing efforts in other places. Having a bug report open for 2 months |
| 13 |
> *should* be *plenty* of time for maintainers to fix their packages. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Great to hear that. I'll be with the rest of the x86 team working this |
| 16 |
afternoon and most of tonight fixing those beans. We actually need a |
| 17 |
games maintainer, considering about half the bugs fall under that |
| 18 |
category. See you there. :) |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
--de. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives