| 1 |
Josh Saddler wrote: |
| 2 |
> Stefan Schweizer wrote: |
| 3 |
>>> they are not defined by their status. I wonder why this word is causing |
| 4 |
>>> problems .. |
| 5 |
>>> |
| 6 |
>>> The status is maybe being an arch tester. This GLEP is not about status, |
| 7 |
>>> only about giving some people bugzilla access when needed. |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>>> -stefan |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Because as much as possible, we need to see something concrete, not "maybe an |
| 12 |
> arch tester." We need to have a better definition of what "when needed is" and |
| 13 |
> who these "some people" are -- think about it. Do we want a system that works |
| 14 |
> like devship, but only halfway -- like you suggested, just passing the ebuild |
| 15 |
> quiz -- or is something more needed? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
These "some people" are people that I deem fit to help on bugzilla for a |
| 18 |
project for which I am lead (or have the leads approval). "When needed" |
| 19 |
is when I think I need people for my project. Concrete enough for you? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Heck my project has 3 non-developer "contributors" right now[1]. |
| 22 |
Do they have bugs access yet? I don't think so; but I don't think they |
| 23 |
will need it either. Then again, afaik all 3 are either AT's or are |
| 24 |
becoming devs soon ;) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
[1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/treecleaners/ |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives