Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mark Bateman <couldbe@××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Qt3 deprecation and removal policy
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 13:44:58
Message-Id: loom.20091231T144027-336@post.gmane.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Qt3 deprecation and removal policy by Ben de Groot
1 Ben de Groot <yngwin <at> gentoo.org> writes:
2
3 >
4 > As announced 5 months ago[1], Gentoo's Qt team now officially
5 > deprecates usage of x11-libs/qt:3 and packages depending on this
6 > version of Qt.
7 >
8
9 > # Policy for remaining ebuilds depending on qt:3 #
10 >
11 > * if Qt3 optional, remove this option
12 > * if Qt4 depending version stable, remove Qt3 depending versions
13 > * if Qt4 depending version in testing, mark stable, then remove older versions
14 > * if no Qt4 version in tree, get Qt4 version in testing by 2010-01-21
15 > and stable by 2010-02-21
16 > * if no Qt4 version exists, check for equivalent/replacement packages,
17 > and mask by 2010-02-21
18 >
19 > Note: for packages that currently have no version marked stable, the
20 > references to stabling Qt4 versions obviously don't apply.
21 >
22 > 1:
23 http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev-announce/msg_d851e05567d538b662f34de8dfdb7316.xml
24 >
25 > Cheers,
26
27
28
29 QUCS is a qt3 only application.
30 This is a fantastic electrical simulation package and is in active developement.
31
32 There is a svn branch for the qt4 port but it isn't there yet.
33 Removal of qt3 will break this app that is in the main tree
34
35 If the policy is to then remove this app (which would be a very big shame since
36 it will mean - based upon past experience - hard to get back in) could a
37 hard-mask live ebuild for the svn/nightly be made until the next qucs is released

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Qt3 deprecation and removal policy Maciej Mrozowski <reavertm@×××××.com>