| 1 |
On 04/05/2015 08:59 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 2:35 PM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> You are ranting at the wrong place. If you want to make a difference, |
| 5 |
>> take this to the openbsd mailing lists. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> It seems unlikely that this would make much of a difference. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
It doesn't make one here. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> I think |
| 13 |
> that allowing this package to create another ffmpeg vs libav mess is a |
| 14 |
> mistake. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
If you want to do some crazy downstream hackery, you'll have to do that |
| 18 |
yourself and count me out. It's not even clear what you want to fix. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
It was known from the start that we do not have ABI-compatibility. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
The only "problem" right now are libressl-exclusive features. These are |
| 23 |
currently optional codepaths afais, so packages still compile with openssl. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Everything else is future prediction. That's why libressl is still in an |
| 26 |
overlay. |
Archives