| 1 |
Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 3 |
>> What, you really think that Donnie doesn't know how the X licence |
| 4 |
>> handling situation breaks GLEP 23? Just how exactly is ACCEPT_LICENSE |
| 5 |
>> usable when you have this? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> [ cropped groups of similar license combinations ] |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Pretty usable, when you consider that it specifies groups. Throw all |
| 10 |
> that stuff into an MIT group and you're good to go. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 13 |
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 02:56:18 -0800 Donnie Berkholz |
| 14 |
> <dberkholz@g.o> wrote: |
| 15 |
> | But I guess you don't think that's good enough for some reason. Since |
| 16 |
> | you've already done the work to analyze the various groups, why don't |
| 17 |
> | you finish it by figuring out the applicable licenses, and whether |
| 18 |
> | new ones need to get added, and send a patch out? |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> All things considered, I've little inclination to do your job for |
| 21 |
> you... QA and not screwing over Gentoo users is your responsibility, not |
| 22 |
> mine. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
Ciaran: does the group stuff Donnie mentioned above fix this? Secondly, how |
| 25 |
difficult would it be for you to do what he asked? I know it's not your |
| 26 |
responsibility, I just want to know whether you can do it fairly easily. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives