From: | Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Policy for migrating library consumers to subslots | ||
Date: | Thu, 26 Sep 2013 18:11:08 | ||
Message-Id: | CAATnKFC54GrQPj5WWPd1HFtxUB__qozRREqdqnTjOB_jQso+MQ@mail.gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Policy for migrating library consumers to subslots by Ciaran McCreesh |
1 | On 27 September 2013 05:57, Ciaran McCreesh |
2 | <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>wrote: |
3 | |
4 | > virtual/perl-* is self-inflicted. |
5 | |
6 | |
7 | How would you recommend it? |
8 | |
9 | Like for instance, we really do need virtuals ( or equivalent ) for many |
10 | things in there, because those things may stop being part of dev-lang/perl |
11 | at a future time. One such example is Module-Build, which means any |
12 | packages that require Module-Build and don't declare virtual/Module-Build |
13 | in their dependency will be broken somewhere after perl 5.20 |
14 | |
15 | |
16 | |
17 | |
18 | -- |
19 | Kent |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Policy for migrating library consumers to subslots | Martin Vaeth <vaeth@××××××××××××××××××××××××.de> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Policy for migrating library consumers to subslots | "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> |