| 1 |
On Tuesday, November 23, 2010 02:56:17 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 11/23/2010 09:32 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Tuesday, November 23, 2010 01:36:15 Graham Murray wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> Mike Frysinger writes: |
| 5 |
> >>> well, not quite. the way we agreed in the past was to not revbump the |
| 6 |
> >>> masked package, but once it was unmasked, we revbump it just once at |
| 7 |
> >>> that point. |
| 8 |
> >> |
| 9 |
> >> Is there somewhere which tells users when there are upgrades to |
| 10 |
> >> toolchain packages which are not revbumped once they have been unmasked |
| 11 |
> >> and in ~arch? |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > if they arent revbumped, then the changes dont matter to you |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> This isn't always the case though, due to developer mistakes. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
now you're talking about a bug that should be reported |
| 18 |
-mike |
Archives