| 1 |
On Sun, 2021-10-03 at 12:30 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 2 |
> > > > > > On Sun, 03 Oct 2021, Robin H Johnson wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > If they are not, I think it would be reasonable to consider removing |
| 5 |
> > CVS from the tree on 2022/01/01. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I disagree. It is still useful as a package even if it hadn't any |
| 8 |
> reverse dependencies. For example, it is needed when doing conversions |
| 9 |
> of historical CVS repositories. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Also projects still use it; OpenBSD may be the most prominent example. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Ulrich |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Those use cases don't necessitate keeping the eclass though? |
Archives