| 1 |
Marius Mauch wrote: |
| 2 |
> "Kevin F. Quinn" <kevquinn@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Arguably no bug is invalid in the normal sense - if someone raises an |
| 5 |
>> issue, they have an issue, regardless what we think of it. To that |
| 6 |
>> end I'd like to propose bugzilla be reconfigured to use the phrase |
| 7 |
>> "NOCHANGE" instead of "INVALID". NOCHANGE would indicate that |
| 8 |
>> whatever the original issue, no change is needed on our part to |
| 9 |
>> resolve the issue. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> _If_ it's changed then please to something else, NOCHANGE would overlap |
| 12 |
> with other values (WONTFIX, CANTFIX, WORKSFORME) and isn't that obvious |
| 13 |
> to me at least. A fake resolution that's mentioned on IRC from time to |
| 14 |
> time is NOTABUG which would fit better here. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I like freedesktop.org's bugzilla, which has INVALID, NOTABUG and |
| 17 |
NOTOURBUG. ;) But yeah, NOTABUG is used by a few different projects and |
| 18 |
seems to work. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
where to now? if i had to guess |
| 23 |
dirtyepic gentoo org i'm afraid to say antarctica's next |
| 24 |
9B81 6C9F E791 83BB 3AB3 5B2D E625 A073 8379 37E8 (0x837937E8) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives