| 1 |
On 12/09/2018 12:38, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: |
| 2 |
> Is there anyone still working on libav support? It appears to me that |
| 3 |
> transition[1] and stabilisation[2] trackers are stuck for a long time without |
| 4 |
> activity. Missing libav-12 stabilisation means that in several stable |
| 5 |
> packages, USE=libav is already inaccessible without manual unmasking of the |
| 6 |
> use flag. I am not prepared to start reverting upstream commits for <libav-12 |
| 7 |
> support[3]. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> If this is not going to change, maybe media-video/libav should be dropped to |
| 10 |
> ~arch. This is still better than dropping support per-package or plastering |
| 11 |
> package.use.stable.mask with libav entries. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=libav-12 |
| 14 |
> [2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/617508 |
| 15 |
> [3] https://bugs.gentoo.org/665518 |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I guess nobody had time to, libav-12 is working correctly on those arches. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Thanks for reminding us. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
lu |
Archives