| 1 |
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 14:20:56 +0200 |
| 2 |
Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 07/18/2018 02:10 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: |
| 5 |
> > I often find myself in the |
| 6 |
> > need to use/invent some abbreviation in order to fit the limit. |
| 7 |
> > Considering this is an error, this sends the message that short is |
| 8 |
> > preferred over clear. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Or that the summary should be concise and a longer proper description |
| 11 |
> can be written in the body of the commit message instead. Potentially |
| 12 |
> mixed in with multiple commits for different logical changes etc etc. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Sure, but that somewhat defeats the point of a summary if it's not |
| 16 |
possible to clearly express what it is about without relying on the |
| 17 |
long description. |
Archives