1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
Since no one has shown concern for these poor, frightened packages, |
5 |
they will be humanely removed from portage. |
6 |
- -Jon |
7 |
|
8 |
Jon Hood wrote: |
9 |
> If anyone has ever tried to run a gnutella gwebcache, they've |
10 |
> probably noticed about 8-10 requests a second. And it increases |
11 |
> during high-usage hours. This makes it useless to run cgi-based |
12 |
> scripts unless you have a super-powerful database and web server. |
13 |
> Since the usefulness of such scripts has gone to practically 0, |
14 |
> they are no longer maintained upstream and I recommend the removal |
15 |
> of them from portage. The following packages headed for the |
16 |
> guillotine are: |
17 |
> |
18 |
> net-p2p/phpgnucacheii net-p2p/gwebcache net-p2p/perlgcache |
19 |
> |
20 |
> The recommended package for anyone wanting to support the gnutella |
21 |
> network is net-p2p/ghostwhitecrab, which is its own built-in |
22 |
> server. Ghostwhitecrab will continue to be maintained both upstream |
23 |
> and in portage. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> If someone would like to save these packages from a gruesome death, |
26 |
> speak now. If not, I'll post another message to gentoo-dev right |
27 |
> before the massacre, and everyone's welcome to join #gentoo-commits |
28 |
> to watch the gore. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> -Jon |
31 |
|
32 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
33 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) |
34 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
35 |
|
36 |
iD8DBQFEhHrjEMeNCT59gpcRAss0AKC3HUMp2wfnSCLf89NplZc3fROOJACfWb2C |
37 |
tRQL1vV253OuIaKfrftisME= |
38 |
=hL2s |
39 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |