Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jon Hood <squinky86@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] removal of cgi-based gwebcache servers
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 18:47:14
Message-Id: 44847AE3.8010307@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] removal of cgi-based gwebcache servers by Jon Hood
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Since no one has shown concern for these poor, frightened packages,
5 they will be humanely removed from portage.
6 - -Jon
7
8 Jon Hood wrote:
9 > If anyone has ever tried to run a gnutella gwebcache, they've
10 > probably noticed about 8-10 requests a second. And it increases
11 > during high-usage hours. This makes it useless to run cgi-based
12 > scripts unless you have a super-powerful database and web server.
13 > Since the usefulness of such scripts has gone to practically 0,
14 > they are no longer maintained upstream and I recommend the removal
15 > of them from portage. The following packages headed for the
16 > guillotine are:
17 >
18 > net-p2p/phpgnucacheii net-p2p/gwebcache net-p2p/perlgcache
19 >
20 > The recommended package for anyone wanting to support the gnutella
21 > network is net-p2p/ghostwhitecrab, which is its own built-in
22 > server. Ghostwhitecrab will continue to be maintained both upstream
23 > and in portage.
24 >
25 > If someone would like to save these packages from a gruesome death,
26 > speak now. If not, I'll post another message to gentoo-dev right
27 > before the massacre, and everyone's welcome to join #gentoo-commits
28 > to watch the gore.
29 >
30 > -Jon
31
32 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
33 Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
34 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
35
36 iD8DBQFEhHrjEMeNCT59gpcRAss0AKC3HUMp2wfnSCLf89NplZc3fROOJACfWb2C
37 tRQL1vV253OuIaKfrftisME=
38 =hL2s
39 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
40
41 --
42 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list