1 |
Current state: "Deferred" |
2 |
Wanted state: "Accepted/Implemented" (at least by me) |
3 |
|
4 |
Open questions from last discussion (March 2006): |
5 |
- Is it possible/should it be possible to have more than one <maintainer> |
6 |
entry? |
7 |
- Is recording an upstream-status (active/inactive) a good idea? |
8 |
Possibilities: |
9 |
An element: <status>{active/inactive}</status> |
10 |
An attribute: <maintainer status="{active/inactive}">... |
11 |
- Is an additional <doc> element needed to link to upstream docs |
12 |
- Must the type of <remote-id> be controlled/listed/checked? |
13 |
|
14 |
My answers to this: |
15 |
- yes |
16 |
- yes. Remark: do we need to specify when upstream has to be marked as |
17 |
active/inactive or can we use our common sense ? |
18 |
- yes. |
19 |
- not yet. Can be defined later. |
20 |
|
21 |
Your oppinion? |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |