Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Tiziano Müller" <dev-zero@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 46: Allow upstream tags in metadata.xml
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:07:46
Message-Id: fmssmd$jat$1@ger.gmane.org
1 Current state: "Deferred"
2 Wanted state: "Accepted/Implemented" (at least by me)
3
4 Open questions from last discussion (March 2006):
5 - Is it possible/should it be possible to have more than one <maintainer>
6 entry?
7 - Is recording an upstream-status (active/inactive) a good idea?
8 Possibilities:
9 An element: <status>{active/inactive}</status>
10 An attribute: <maintainer status="{active/inactive}">...
11 - Is an additional <doc> element needed to link to upstream docs
12 - Must the type of <remote-id> be controlled/listed/checked?
13
14 My answers to this:
15 - yes
16 - yes. Remark: do we need to specify when upstream has to be marked as
17 active/inactive or can we use our common sense ?
18 - yes.
19 - not yet. Can be defined later.
20
21 Your oppinion?
22
23
24 --
25 gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list

Replies