| 1 |
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:03:50 +0300 |
| 2 |
Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 13.08.2012 19:55, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 5 |
> [ ... ] |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I should mention that we have discussed this already, |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364375 |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Which was a result of long gentoo-dev ML thread, unfortunately my |
| 12 |
> search foo failed and I couldn't find straight link to it |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Why should we threat /usr than / any different in this regard, there |
| 15 |
> was large consensus /lib/udev should be used instead of /lib64/udev |
| 16 |
> and udev.pc's udevdir= is the path for "udev helpers", ELFs(!), and |
| 17 |
> rules among other things |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> It's completely fair to say that multilib-strict feature has been |
| 20 |
> broken ever since, years. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
well, i dont agree its fair :P |
| 23 |
it breaks on _pie_ executables, which are not that common if you dont |
| 24 |
run hardened. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
what is broken, and has been broken since years is multilib-strict + |
| 27 |
pie toolchain; a flaw in the multilib-strict detection system that gets |
| 28 |
confused by 'file' output on pie executables :) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
A. |
Archives