1 |
On Tuesday 13 December 2005 11:45, Andrew Muraco wrote: |
2 |
> Jason Stubbs wrote: |
3 |
> >On Tuesday 13 December 2005 11:22, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
4 |
> >>On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:17:30 +0900 Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o> |
5 |
> >> |
6 |
> >>wrote: |
7 |
> >>| So what are you going to do? I asked already but you didn't answer. |
8 |
> >>| How are you going to find $PORTDIR/metadata/news? |
9 |
> >> |
10 |
> >>At present, by using portageq with a hardcoded suffix. If in the future |
11 |
> >>Portage introduces new functionality, then clients and the |
12 |
> >>specification can easily be updated to handle said functionality. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> >And how can that be adapted to work with overlays, completely ignoring the |
15 |
> >possibility of distinct repositories. Overlays is something that exists |
16 |
> >already and news support for them is a request that will appear as soon as |
17 |
> >news support is added. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Your Point is Moot ... |
20 |
|
21 |
Interesting use of capitals. |
22 |
|
23 |
> because an overlay (at present) is going to be exprimental software, |
24 |
|
25 |
or a repository from a non-English speaking community Gentoo site... |
26 |
|
27 |
> (unsupported offically anyways) and so you _should_ know what risks your |
28 |
> taking, |
29 |
|
30 |
except if your a new non-English-speaking user utilizing such a repository. |
31 |
|
32 |
> this GLEP is to warn you about supported updates/changes which you _need_ to |
33 |
> know about. |
34 |
|
35 |
This GLEP is about getting news regarding a set of ebuilds to the user. Making |
36 |
it only about the Gentoo supported tree serves no purpose. |
37 |
|
38 |
> Why should an overlay need to have news if the user has the consciensely |
39 |
> update and maintain it to begin it. |
40 |
|
41 |
Because they already support package.mask, thirdpartymirrors, eclasses and |
42 |
just about anything else that exists in the supported tree. |
43 |
|
44 |
-- |
45 |
Jason Stubbs |
46 |
-- |
47 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |