Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] add apache to metadata.dtd
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 13:31:09
Message-Id: 41ec5899d6664839e7eba3f231b4414861327083.camel@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] add apache to metadata.dtd by "Volkmar W. Pogatzki"
1 On Fri, 2022-11-25 at 14:28 +0100, Volkmar W. Pogatzki wrote:
2 > > Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> hat am 25.11.2022 14:16 CET
3 > > geschrieben:
4 > >
5 > >  
6 > > On Fri, 2022-11-25 at 10:04 +0100, Volkmar W. Pogatzki wrote:
7 > > > > This doesn't seem consistent.  How is it supposed to work?
8 > >
9 > > You didn't answer this question.
10 > >
11 > > --
12 > > Best regards,
13 > > Michał Górny
14 >
15 > Sorry. I have to admit I have no idea how remote-id works and what's
16 > needed to make a new remote-id work.
17 >
18 > I was asked on https://bugs.gentoo.org/882351 to post here, so I did.
19 >
20 > What did you mean with »doesn't seem consistent«,
21 > why should an "apache" remote-id not be possible?
22
23 Let me rephrase the question: what will be the remote-id values for
24 these packages? How can you handle the case when some of the packages
25 are at top level of the domain, while others are in subpage?
26
27 --
28 Best regards,
29 Michał Górny