1 |
On Fri, 2022-11-25 at 14:28 +0100, Volkmar W. Pogatzki wrote: |
2 |
> > Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> hat am 25.11.2022 14:16 CET |
3 |
> > geschrieben: |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > On Fri, 2022-11-25 at 10:04 +0100, Volkmar W. Pogatzki wrote: |
7 |
> > > > This doesn't seem consistent. How is it supposed to work? |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > You didn't answer this question. |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > -- |
12 |
> > Best regards, |
13 |
> > Michał Górny |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Sorry. I have to admit I have no idea how remote-id works and what's |
16 |
> needed to make a new remote-id work. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> I was asked on https://bugs.gentoo.org/882351 to post here, so I did. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> What did you mean with »doesn't seem consistent«, |
21 |
> why should an "apache" remote-id not be possible? |
22 |
|
23 |
Let me rephrase the question: what will be the remote-id values for |
24 |
these packages? How can you handle the case when some of the packages |
25 |
are at top level of the domain, while others are in subpage? |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
Best regards, |
29 |
Michał Górny |