| 1 |
On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 20:10:38 +0100 |
| 2 |
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 21:07:30 +0200 |
| 5 |
> Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 19:08:33 +0100 |
| 7 |
> > Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 8 |
> > > On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 17:23:40 +0200 |
| 9 |
> > > Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 10 |
> > > > An effective SDEPEND implementation is definitely nowhere close |
| 11 |
> > > > to simple. Nor is presenting those dependencies to users. |
| 12 |
> > > |
| 13 |
> > > Indeed it's not, but we *do* have a reference implementation and |
| 14 |
> > > lots of practical experience with it, and we have worked out all |
| 15 |
> > > the difficulties. |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > Yes, I am pretty sure you tested it with *many different* packages. |
| 18 |
> > Maybe even all packages you have in Exherbo. Could you give some |
| 19 |
> > actual numbers, and details? |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> That depends. Are we seriously considering this for implementation on |
| 22 |
> Gentoo at any time in the foreseeable future? Writing this all up |
| 23 |
> properly is a lot of work, and I don't see much point in putting in |
| 24 |
> the effort if it isn't going to go anywhere. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Yes, we are. Zac was very positive about implementing it. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Best regards, |
| 30 |
Michał Górny |
Archives