| 1 |
\On 20:10 Tue 15 Jul , Patrick Börjesson wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 2008-07-15 21:40, Tiziano Müller uttered these thoughts: |
| 3 |
> > Yes. I think that's something which should be done manually. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Indeed, the correct solution would be to state the deps manually in each |
| 6 |
> ebuild that requires the dep. But in this case it would mean adjusting |
| 7 |
> the DEPEND string of pretty much the entire tree. Until such measures |
| 8 |
> are stated required, this would be a good middle ground, no? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Could someone explain why manually doing work is better than |
| 11 |
automatically detecting the deps? This sounds like an argument against |
| 12 |
automation, and I'm not following it. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Thanks, |
| 16 |
Donnie |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Donnie Berkholz |
| 19 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux |
| 20 |
Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com |
Archives