| 1 |
On Jan 6, 2008 1:33 AM, Ciaran McCreesh |
| 2 |
<ciaran.mccreesh@×××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 09:03:43 -0500 (EST) |
| 4 |
> "Caleb Tennis" <caleb@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > If anyone has any examples of where they really are being held back |
| 6 |
> > > and where they really have given the arch teams plenty of time to do |
| 7 |
> > > something, I'd like to see them... Somehow I doubt it happens very |
| 8 |
> > > often, if at all. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > Why? You aren't the person I or anyone else has to make a case to. |
| 11 |
> > In fact, I never would have mailed the list about this to prevent |
| 12 |
> > this very type of potentially-out-of-control discussion from |
| 13 |
> > occurring, except that the e-mail from Mike said that discussion |
| 14 |
> > topics needed to be sent to the list. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Ah, so you'd like the Council to jump to some arbitrary decision, |
| 17 |
> rather than hearing specific examples and evidence from all involved? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
No. What he meant and doesn't dare to say is you didn't ask, but |
| 20 |
demanded, in your usual dry and pesky "I'm a spoiled 6-year old" tone. |
| 21 |
And this as usual results in people ignoring you. People aren't as |
| 22 |
stupid as you think they are, and they don't want to play this game |
| 23 |
with you anymore. So don't build a case on the fact that you're not |
| 24 |
getting answers. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Someday you'll understand this. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Oh, and council members too aren't as stupid as you think they are. If |
| 29 |
they decide to discuss this, one of their first steps will surely be |
| 30 |
to try and evaluate what the current situation is. If I were a council |
| 31 |
member I'd probably feel offended by such condescension from your |
| 32 |
part. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Denis. |
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives