| 1 |
On 2/23/18 11:22 AM, Matthias Maier wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018, at 10:01 CST, "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> [...] |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
>> I'm not even sure a news item is needed here. What do people think? If |
| 8 |
>> you think so, who do I even direct it at? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> If there is no action needed on user side and an upgrade and migration |
| 11 |
> from uclibc to uclibc-ng happens automatically, I'd say no news item is |
| 12 |
> necessary. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Further, seeing "uclibc-ng" being emerged and "uclibc" unmerged should |
| 15 |
> be pretty self explanatory. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Best, |
| 18 |
> Matthias |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I already sent a news item for migrating uclibc -> uclibc-ng some years |
| 22 |
ago. After 6 years, anyone still on uclibc has a seriously broken |
| 23 |
system. I doubt migration is even possible at this point. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. |
| 27 |
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] |
| 28 |
E-Mail : blueness@g.o |
| 29 |
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA |
| 30 |
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA |
Archives