| 1 |
On Monday 16 May 2005 08:01 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 16 May 2005 19:45:05 -0400 Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> wrote: |
| 5 |
> | On Monday 16 May 2005 07:08 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 6 |
> | > What, so that you can see which bugs a small but vocal group of |
| 7 |
> | > ricers are interested in rather than the ones that're actually |
| 8 |
> | > important? |
| 9 |
> | |
| 10 |
> | once again, voting is optional ... if you dont want to pay attention |
| 11 |
> | to them, then dont |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Ok. Please provide me with a procmail rule that will filter bug comment |
| 14 |
> emails which whine about votes being ignored whilst letting legit |
| 15 |
> comments through. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
i dont see how that differs any from users whining about how a bug has been |
| 18 |
open "foooooooooorever" or how there's "a billion people in the cc list" and |
| 19 |
yet the fix still isnt in portage ! clearly developers are a bunch of jerk |
| 20 |
offs since my bug hasnt been fixed yesterday ! |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
ive seen users complain on bugs/version bump requests that were open for less |
| 23 |
than 3 days and dealt with packages that were far from critical (i.e. a |
| 24 |
package in emulation or games) |
| 25 |
-mike |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives