| 1 |
On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 20:38:18 -0600 |
| 2 |
Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Some packages, like dbus[1], have testing features that, while useful |
| 5 |
> for developers and arch-testers, aren't something that should be |
| 6 |
> foisted on users. Dbus' case is extreme, as it builds-in functions |
| 7 |
> that are useful for unit testing, but result in an insecure and |
| 8 |
> unstable package |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
You could build it twice in the same ebuild... Of course, you still |
| 11 |
wouldn't be testing the same thing as you're installing, but then again |
| 12 |
upstream releases it that way. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Regards, |
| 16 |
jer |
Archives