1 |
On July 9, 2018 4:40:22 AM EDT, "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
>Hi, |
3 |
> |
4 |
>We currently don't enforce any particular standard for e-mail addresses |
5 |
>for developers committing to gentoo.git. FWICS, the majority of |
6 |
>developers is using their @gentoo.org e-mail addresses. However, a few |
7 |
>developers are using some other addresses. |
8 |
> |
9 |
>Using non-@g.o e-mail addresses generally causes problems |
10 |
>in accounting for commits. For example, our retirement scripts can't |
11 |
>detect commits made using non-Gentoo e-mail address. My dev-timeline |
12 |
>scripts [1] account for all emails in LDAP (which doesn't cover all |
13 |
>addresses developers use). FWIK gkeys accounts for all addresses |
14 |
>in the OpenPGP key UIDs. In my opinion, that's a lot of hoops to jump |
15 |
>through to workaround bad practice. |
16 |
> |
17 |
>Therefore, I'd like to start enforcing (at the level of the hook |
18 |
>verifying signatures) that all commits made to gentoo.git (and other |
19 |
>repositories requiring dev signatures) are made using @gentoo.org |
20 |
>e-mail |
21 |
>address (for committer field). |
22 |
> |
23 |
>Is anyone opposed to that? Does anyone know of a valid reason to use |
24 |
>non-@g.o address when committing? |
25 |
> |
26 |
>[1]:https://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/dev-timeline.html |
27 |
|
28 |
No reason I can see to not enforce this. Please do! |
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. |