Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Davide Pesavento <pesa@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] 'Gentoo Linux' bugzilla component reorganization
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 19:57:36
Message-Id: CADfzvvaT8AKeT7zNo7TTK-1mLjg0n19w3B2WcojYDfxvdtw4uQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] 'Gentoo Linux' bugzilla component reorganization by "Michał Górny"
1 On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
2 > I would personally go for the following layout:
3 >
4 > - All packages,
5 > - Core system [includes baselayout],
6 > - Eclasses and Profiles,
7 > - GCC Porting,
8 > - Hardened,
9 > - Keywording & Stabilization,
10 > - New packages ('New ebuilds' previously),
11 > - SELinux.
12 >
13 [...]
14 >
15 > Your thoughts?
16 >
17
18 I'd split "eclasses" from "profiles", as they're not normally related
19 to each other.
20
21 We could also have separate components for "keywording" vs
22 "stabilization", which would make the use of STABLEREQ/KEYWORDREQ
23 keywords obsolete at the same time.
24
25 Thanks,
26 Davide

Replies