| 1 |
On 3 July 2012 19:08, Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 3 Jul 2012 15:44:04 +1200 |
| 3 |
> Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> Firstly, we already have a ^^( ) syntax for REQUIRED_USE , "one of, |
| 5 |
>> but not more than one of". |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> A user has a and b installed. c depends upon ^^ ( a b ). The user tries |
| 8 |
> to install c. What happens? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I'd expect that the user would have to remove one of ( a b ), the |
| 11 |
natural choice would be to remove b, a taking precedence. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> -- |
| 14 |
> Ciaran McCreesh |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Kent |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
perl -e "print substr( \"edrgmaM SPA NOcomil.ic\\@tfrken\", \$_ * 3, |
| 22 |
3 ) for ( 9,8,0,7,1,6,5,4,3,2 );" |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
http://kent-fredric.fox.geek.nz |
Archives