| 1 |
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Brad Laue wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 07:40, Ferris McCormick wrote: |
| 4 |
> > This wasn't quite what I had in mind when I asked how you wanted to |
| 5 |
> > address an apparent problem with mozilla & garbage: |
| 6 |
> > (I understand these are probably unrelated problems: mozilla+garbage & |
| 7 |
> > mozilla-stable-ebuild removed, but I can't resist suggesting a |
| 8 |
> > conspiracy...:-) .) |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> As vapier stated, the ebuild was removed because it is old. It is the |
| 11 |
> responsibility of each architecture maintainer to keep the mozilla |
| 12 |
> versions up to date. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
Not to beat a dead horse, but how can an ebuild that was marked |
| 15 |
stable for ia64 four days ago suddenly become obsolete??? That's |
| 16 |
a pretty short life span. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> I have asked repeatedly that people do this, as I do not have IA64, |
| 19 |
> SPARC, AMD64 or PowerPC systems available to me on which I can build and |
| 20 |
> test Mozilla out. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> The userbase can help their respective architectures out by stating that |
| 23 |
> a specific version of Mozilla is serviceable on theirs, and ask to have |
| 24 |
> it marked 'arch' on their particular CPU type. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Brad |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@××××××××.com> |
| 32 |
Phone: (703) 392-0303 |
| 33 |
Fax: (703) 392-0401 |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives