| 1 |
Richard Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> Mart Raudsepp wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> Is it stated in any documentation that 30 days is a policy? |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Not that I'm aware of - it is a guideline as you indicate. However, |
| 8 |
> don't expect anybody to actually take action on a STABLEREQ if there |
| 9 |
> isn't some kind of rationale for going stable so quickly. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Yes it's a guideline that you should follow unless you can give reasons |
| 13 |
to deviate. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> The whole point of stable is that they provide some sanity to the |
| 17 |
> release process - if upstream releases a new version every other week |
| 18 |
> then perhaps we should either: |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> 1. Question whether it should go stable at all. |
| 21 |
> 2. Pick a version once in a while and target it for stabilization, |
| 22 |
> backporting fixes as needed. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Yeah one can question if adding every release is really important for users. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Regards, |
| 28 |
Petteri |
Archives