| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 16/09/15 02:13 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote: |
| 5 |
> How would virtuals be handled with static dependencies? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
AFAIK virtuals would need to be handled the same as anything else -- |
| 8 |
when updating an atom in RDEPEND, the virtual's ebuild needs to be |
| 9 |
revbumped. This would mean that on --update --deep, the new virtual |
| 10 |
would get emerged and so the VDB would be updated again with the |
| 11 |
proper list of atom(s) that satisfy it. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Same would have to go for eclasses that include dependencies -- any |
| 14 |
time an atom changes, the eclass needs to be revbumped and anything |
| 15 |
inheriting it also needs to be revbumped (and its inherit line |
| 16 |
adjusted). Of course we may need some well-defined guidelines (if |
| 17 |
we don't have them already) on when and how we can remove the old |
| 18 |
eclasses. |
| 19 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 20 |
Version: GnuPG v2 |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlX5vjcACgkQAJxUfCtlWe2UiQD/V+w5t64RkYsqFMqYZevlmVH4 |
| 23 |
01NkXPI0b9NmM4+chSEBANl2HL+KryM5avwa4EDTYbSA11W4IeTVc+lww9MJXn+V |
| 24 |
=RZgQ |
| 25 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives