| 1 |
Dan Armak wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thursday 17 March 2005 00:07, Tom Wesley wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>I can't disagree that p'masking a bucket-load of packages, all at |
| 5 |
>>different versions will be a pain. Also, upgrading etc may require a |
| 6 |
>>small army of gnome's (pun intended) to complete the task in a timely |
| 7 |
>>manner. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Indeed. Which is why I don't want to do this. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
>>Do any kde applications release outside of kde's main releases? (I have |
| 13 |
>>a vague recollection of kopete doing this, but no others) |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Usually they stop when, or soon after, they are made part of an official |
| 16 |
> kde.org package. I can't recall any app that does this right now. Anyway, for |
| 17 |
> the very few that do, we can include extra releases with made-up version |
| 18 |
> numbers (or dates) that sort of make sense. These cases are so rare that this |
| 19 |
> doesn't fall into the 'confusing users' category IMHO. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Given those facts you've probably decided upon the best numbering |
| 22 |
scheme... Confused users can easily be directed to use the KDE version |
| 23 |
numbers I guess... |
| 24 |
Thanks for entertaining the idea ;) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Tom Wesley <tom@×××××.org> |
Archives