| 1 |
On 5/14/10 3:54 PM, Matti Bickel wrote: |
| 2 |
>>From my work on b.g.o: I use a simplified version of this, shown at: |
| 3 |
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~mabi/gentooBzLifecycle.png |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Yeah, I think the linked diagram really reflects the reality, much |
| 6 |
better than the "official" one. I'm in favor of removing the "Verified" |
| 7 |
resolution to clean things up. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I haven't seen a project where the "Verified" status would be useful. |
| 10 |
Generally the reporters re-open their bugs if they are not satisfied. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Also, for many classes of bugs verification gives absolutely no |
| 13 |
benefits, e.g. keywording, stabilization, etc. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
If we want to keep "Verified", then in my opinion some group should be |
| 16 |
created to verify bugs consistently. If it's just one user doing it, I |
| 17 |
see no benefits, and only background noise. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Note: maybe that user would like to help in the bugzilla in a way we'd |
| 20 |
all agree to be useful. For example wrangling bugs (assigning to right |
| 21 |
owners, getting more info, etc). Please make sure not to discourage him |
| 22 |
from contributing more by too harsh comments. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Paweł |
Archives
