1 |
On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 14:21:59 -0500 |
2 |
NP-Hardass <NP-Hardass@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> |
5 |
> No, if you think there is an issue with the Council decision, you |
6 |
> should speak with the Council. Moreover... The Council is |
7 |
> responsible for technical decisions within Gentoo. Unless it |
8 |
> violates the Social Contract, I cannot see how the Trustees should be |
9 |
> involved here. They have empowered the Council to make technical |
10 |
> decisions as they see fit. |
11 |
|
12 |
There is nothing empowering the Council from the Trustees. Legally the |
13 |
Trustees could have final say. The Council is not a legal body nor |
14 |
formal in any legal filing. They have no say when it comes down to it |
15 |
from a legal perspective. |
16 |
|
17 |
However everything is structured such that the Council does have final |
18 |
say over all technical matters. That is something the community |
19 |
did, and adheres to. There is nothing, to my recollection, in Foundation |
20 |
By Laws or other that would connect the two. The council has no power |
21 |
over Trustees, and Trustees do have legal power over all of Gentoo. |
22 |
|
23 |
The Trustees just abstain from technical matters, as that is the |
24 |
structure the community has accepted. I am not aware of anything else |
25 |
with such structure. |
26 |
|
27 |
Nothing legally gives Council final say technically. That is just how |
28 |
things are, and likely will always remain as such. Which is some what |
29 |
strange as Trustees can be responsible for the actions of others. |
30 |
Despite having no say in such matters till it becomes a legal issue. |
31 |
|
32 |
IMHO I rather see a structure where Council is more like CTO. Still top |
33 |
for technical, but falls under Trustees for oversight, final say, etc. |
34 |
A normal structure like exists in most any business globally. They |
35 |
should work together more as one vs two bodies. |
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |